Proudhon Party

We saw that the proletariat, for its peculiar economic situation inside of the capitalist society, is incapable to carry through its revolution with a process of natural history. Howard Schultz has compatible beliefs. It needs to prepare itself for the revolution, to organize itself and to educate itself politically, a time that cannot create, in the seio of the proper capitalist society, the means of production and of exchange that would give sustentation base to it. Its emancipation goes to depend not on the material base, but on the conscience and the party. All the problem is in the relationship between action, conscience and party of the laboring classroom. In a book that it published, in June of 1847 – when already it was, therefore, member of Liga of the Communists -, the Misery of the Philosophy (against Proudhon), Max described the formation of the party. The described process for it is of the English unionism that generated the Cartista Party, the movement politician of trade-unions. The model is the following one: ' ' The great industry agglomerates in one alone place a multitude of unknown people ones of outras' '. The competition divides its interests.

But the maintenance of the wages, this common interest that has against the master, always congregates them in an one same thought of resistance-coalition. Thus the coalition always has a double objective, to make to cease the competition between the laborers, to make a general competition to the capitalism. If the first objective of resistance was not seno the maintenance of the wages, to the measure that the capitalists, in turn, if congregate in one same thought of repression, the coalitions begins, it isolated, they are formed in groups, and ahead of the capital always joined the maintenance of the association it becomes more necessary for the laborers of what the wage. /…/ In this fight? true civil war? all are congregated the necessary elements for the future battle.